Q: What are legal rights of Right in Rem and Right against personam ?

Ans: Right in Rem and Right in Personam both are legal rights and both right in rem and right in personam can be violated in case of tort.

Right in Rem: 

When you sign a contract, you are given certain rights that are attached to the specific thing or property mentioned in the contract. These rights are called "rights in rem" or "property rights".

Right in Personam:

A right in personam is different from a right in rem, and it is a legal right that is conferred on a single person or party to a contract.

Rights in rem are rights that relate to a specific property and can be enforced against anyone who interferes with that property. On the other hand, rights in personam are rights that relate to a specific person and can only be enforced against that person.

Rights in rem are considered absolute rights because they are enforceable against anyone who interferes with the property, regardless of whether that person has any relationship with the property owner. In contrast, rights in personam are considered relative rights because they are enforceable only against a specific person.

Rights in rem are rights that relate to a specific property and can be enforced against anyone who interferes with that property. On the other hand, rights in personam are rights that relate to a specific person and can only be enforced against that person.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Difference between Injuria Sine Damno and Damnum Sine Injuria ?

Ans: Tort in Injuria Sine Damno and Damnum Sine Injuria. Injury means the legal right has been violated.  In Injuria Sine Damno, there is an injury without damage.  Here, the legal right has been violated  but there is no damage and the essential condition in Tort is that the legal right must be violated. Thus, Injuria Sine Damno is to be considered in Tort.  Damnum Sine Injuria means there are damages but there is no injury. Here, there are damages but the legal right has not violated. The essential condition in tort is that the legal right must be violated but here there is no violation of legal right. Hence, Damnum Sine Injuria is not considered in tort.
Read more

Q: What is Re Polemis Case in tort of remoteness of damage?

Ans: In Re Polemis case, court rejected test of reasonable foresight and applied test of directness of tort of remoteness of damage.  Re Polemis Case The defendant hired (chartered) a ship. He loaded ship with tin of benzene and petrol. Due to leakage of the tins some petrol collected on the hold of ship. Due to negligence of defendant servant, a plank fell on the hold and spark caused fire in the whole ship. Ship was burnt totally. Here defendant was held liable although he cannot reasonable foresee. Test of directness was applied.
Read more

Q: Elaborate the citation of Rajasthan v. Mst. Vidhyawati and another (1962) ?

Ans:  The State of Rajasthan v. Mst. Vidhyawati and another (1962). Lokumal i.e. Defendant no. 1, a temporary employee of the State of Rajasthan was employed as a motor driver (on probation) of a government jeep car under the Collector of Udaipur. The car had been sent for repairs. On February 11, 1952, while driving the car back from the workshop after the repairs were done, defendant no. 1 knocked down one Jagdishlal, who was walking on the footpath by the side of the public road. Jagdishlal was severely injured and his skull and backbone were fractured. Three days later, he died in the hospital.  The court held that the state will be liable to pay compensation for the Tort of his employee.
Read more